<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dishing it: Catty about a Dog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.romanceforrealwomen.com/63/dishing-it-catty-about-a-dog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.romanceforrealwomen.com/63/dishing-it-catty-about-a-dog/</link>
	<description>Life, love and opinion for Real Women</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: romance</title>
		<link>http://www.romanceforrealwomen.com/63/dishing-it-catty-about-a-dog/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>romance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romanceforrealwomen.com/?p=63#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected...on more than one count.  But come on, didn't Di look marvelous in some of those gowns?  I definitely succumbed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected&#8230;on more than one count.  But come on, didn&#8217;t Di look marvelous in some of those gowns?  I definitely succumbed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LBH</title>
		<link>http://www.romanceforrealwomen.com/63/dishing-it-catty-about-a-dog/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>LBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.romanceforrealwomen.com/?p=63#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Sorry to point this out--her name is Camilla Parker-Bowles not Jones. At least it was until she married Charles which I think makes her Windsor. Those pesky royals and their names! Frankly, I rather like her. As perhaps one of the few people in the world who thought Diana was a neurotic twit, I think she and Charles quite suit. Too bad it took so many years and so much public humiliation for them to end up together. Given my dismal history, I'm certainly the last person to trash people for making bad spouse choices then trying to correct them. 

So Camilla's a bit dowdy and horse-faced--hello, she's British! All British women of a certain age look like John Cleese in drag. At least she isn't jet-setting around the world, sunning naked on Arab sheiks' yachts. (Okay, Diana did produce two nice looking princes.) All in all, Camilla seems to behave and keep Charles out of severe trouble while he's waiting for Mum to go. What more can we expect of a royal spouse these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to point this out&#8211;her name is Camilla Parker-Bowles not Jones. At least it was until she married Charles which I think makes her Windsor. Those pesky royals and their names! Frankly, I rather like her. As perhaps one of the few people in the world who thought Diana was a neurotic twit, I think she and Charles quite suit. Too bad it took so many years and so much public humiliation for them to end up together. Given my dismal history, I&#8217;m certainly the last person to trash people for making bad spouse choices then trying to correct them. </p>
<p>So Camilla&#8217;s a bit dowdy and horse-faced&#8211;hello, she&#8217;s British! All British women of a certain age look like John Cleese in drag. At least she isn&#8217;t jet-setting around the world, sunning naked on Arab sheiks&#8217; yachts. (Okay, Diana did produce two nice looking princes.) All in all, Camilla seems to behave and keep Charles out of severe trouble while he&#8217;s waiting for Mum to go. What more can we expect of a royal spouse these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

